Sign in with your NHL account:
  • Submit
  • Or
  • Sign in with Google

Is There A Rivalry?

It's Just "Play Hockey" Between San Jose and Detroit

Friday, 04.29.2011 / 5:56 PM / News
By San Jose Sharks Staff
Share with your Friends

Is There A Rivalry?
There’s one odd facet to the Sharks-Red Wings rivalry – the venom that usually accompanies two elite clubs regularly meeting in the postseason really isn’t there.

San Jose Sharks center Joe Pavelski, left, works for the puck against Los Angeles Kings center Michal Handzus during the first period of Game 6 of a first-round NHL hockey Stanley Cup playoff series in Los Angeles, Monday, April 25, 2011. (AP Photo/Chris Carlson)
“Not yet,” Joe Pavelski said. “That can change in a hurry. I think both groups understand you have to win games and you have to get to four wins before the other team.”

There’s simply no time for shenanigans when so much is at stake and the opposition isn’t going to bite.

“Against Detroit, it’s just line up and compete,” Ryane Clowe said. “There are no secrets system-wise.”

Part is a mutual respect for the other side and that both clubs are very smart about this stage of the playoffs. Detroit’s style also doesn’t lead to too many physical altercations. They play hard and are physical, but in a controlled way. The good news is the Sharks can play that style as well.

“Detroit is a little different than an L.A. They like to initiate their hits and battle, but they don’t retaliate or they will skate away from the stuff around the net,” Clowe said. “The cheap shots or the trash talking, they really don’t get involved in that stuff.”

“They’re pretty veteran crew. They know they aren’t going to win the series by sitting in the penalty box. We know exactly the same thing,” Scott Nichol said. “We’re (both) really conscious of the special teams.”

It could happen, but don’t expect the gloves to come off a lot in the next two weeks.

“It’s a physical battle, but not by dropping the gloves and fighting,” Nichol said. “It’s physical because you’re in your own end because they protect pucks well. Or our big players are so heavy that they wear their D down. That’s where the draining is. Not so much doing the 10-foot run to hit guys.”

There’s one guarantee: two good hockey clubs will begin a hard-played series on Friday night.

“I’m looking forward to it,” Dan Boyle said. “It’s going to be a hard fought series.”

The Red Wings have been waiting a bit longer (they haven’t played since April 20), but the Sharks are just as anxious to get things started.

“After the L.A. series, you want to get right back on in and play the next night,” Joe Thornton said. “We went over their strengths and weaknesses and can’t wait to get started tonight.”

There’s a special bond among players from the Canadian province of Newfoundland as there aren’t a lot of NHLers from the region. However, there are two in the Sharks-Wings series -- Clowe and Dan Cleary -- and the series will carry extra attention in their home province. The other Newfies are Teddy Purcell of Tampa Bay and Boston’s Michael Ryder.

San Jose Sharks right wing Ryane Clowe (29) checks Los Angeles Kings right wing Dustin Brown (23) during the third period in Game 5 of a first-round NHL Stanley Cup playoffs hockey series in San Jose, Calif., Saturday, April 23, 2011. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma)
“There’s more (attention) right now because there are four of us and four out of eight teams is pretty good,” Clowe said. “All with pretty good chances of making something happen here.”

“Where Danny is from and where I’m from, the senior hockey rivalry is big, so I’m sure there will be a lot of late nights back home. Danny and I grew up in small communities and the senior hockey rivalry back home was always big.”

Due to the matchup in Silicon Valley and the Motor City, at least one Newfoundland product will have a chance to in the next round.

“I just like to see the Newfies do well and one of us is going to the Western Conference Finals which is nice,” Clowe said.

This marks the fifth all-time matchup between the Sharks and the Red Wings in the postseason. Below is a brief history of their playoff series.

San Jose dispatched Detroit in five games, but the series was closer than the record indicates. Thanks to a singular blowout in Game 4, Detroit actually outscored San Jose, 17-15. San Jose captured four, one- goal games, including three consecutive 4-3 contests to begin the series. In fact, the Sharks won the first three games.

San Jose won two of the first three games and was closing in on a two-game lead, but a late regulation-time goal, followed by an overtime tally, gave the Red Wings Game 4 and they were victorious in the next two games to close out the series.

This series came the year after San Jose’s 1994 first round upset and it was the only sweep in the clubs’ postseason history. Detroit smothered San Jose 6-0 in Game 1 and continued the assault with three consecutive 6-2 wins. The Wings scored 24 goals in just four contests.

This is still the defining series in the Sharks long postseason history. Coming in as the eighth seed and still viewed as an expansion club, they won the first playoff series in franchise history against an Original Six club. Igor Larionov (who later won a championship with Detroit) led the way with 10 points, Sergei Makarov scored six times and Arturs Irbe was “like wall.” But it was Jamie Baker who stole the show with his dramatic Game 7 winner.

By the way, get some thoughts from the Detroit side by clicking here:

Opening faceoff for Game 1 is at 7 p.m. Watch on CSN-CA in HD and listen on 98.5/102.1 K-FOX and the Sharks Radio Network and online at




1 z - ANA 82 54 20 8 266 209 116
2 y - COL 82 52 22 8 250 220 112
3 x - STL 82 52 23 7 248 191 111
4 x - SJS 82 51 22 9 249 200 111
5 x - CHI 82 46 21 15 267 220 107
6 x - LAK 82 46 28 8 206 174 100
7 x - MIN 82 43 27 12 207 206 98
8 x - DAL 82 40 31 11 235 228 91
9 PHX 82 37 30 15 216 231 89
10 NSH 82 38 32 12 216 242 88
11 WPG 82 37 35 10 227 237 84
12 VAN 82 36 35 11 196 223 83
13 CGY 82 35 40 7 209 241 77
14 EDM 82 29 44 9 203 270 67


J. Pavelski 82 41 38 23 79
J. Thornton 82 11 65 20 76
P. Marleau 82 33 37 0 70
L. Couture 65 23 31 21 54
B. Burns 69 22 26 26 48
T. Wingels 77 16 22 11 38
D. Boyle 75 12 24 -8 36
J. Demers 75 5 29 14 34
T. Hertl 37 15 10 11 25
M. Nieto 66 10 14 -4 24
A. Stalock 12 5 2 .932 1.87
A. Niemi 39 17 7 .913 2.39
Image Map